shouldibuythat
← All Projectors verdicts
Projectors · head to head

PX2-Pro vs UHZ50

Reddit's answer is the Hisense PX2-Pro. Buy only if you want a UST laser projector and prioritize value and price over best-in-class contrast. The UHZ50 is a Stay Away — don’t buy it — get the BenQ instead.

Hisense PX2-Pro
Hisense · Projectors

PX2-Pro

Risky Buy—
49% of 53 owners recommend
No recurring failure pattern found across 40 threads.

Buy only if you want a UST laser projector and prioritize value and price over best-in-class contrast.

+ A vocal minority say it punches above its weight for the price in the UST category.

− Contrast is a recurring complaint — repeatedly mentioned as the unit's most meaningful weakness.

Full verdict →
Optoma UHZ50
Optoma · Projectors

UHZ50

Stay Away$2,569.99
25% of 58 owners recommend
~1 in 6 failure rate — ~1 in 6 long-term owner reports describe a hardware failure, spread across eARC/HDMI handshake, pixels/DMD, eARC/HDMI port, DMD chip, firmware/board, and DMD chip/white pixel issues. No clear onset window or warranty resolution pattern is available from the data.

Don’t buy it — get the BenQ instead

+ A vocal minority of long-term owners report trouble-free operation and praise its durability.

− Reliability is a recurring issue — eARC handshake, DMD chip, firmware, and port failures all appear in long-term reports.

Full verdict →

Questions people keep asking

Which is better, the PX2-Pro or the UHZ50?

Reddit's answer is the Hisense PX2-Pro. Buy only if you want a UST laser projector and prioritize value and price over best-in-class contrast. The UHZ50 is a Stay Away — don’t buy it — get the BenQ instead.

Is the Hisense PX2-Pro worth it?

Reddit's verdict is Risky Buy. Buy only if you want a UST laser projector and prioritize value and price over best-in-class contrast. Good brightness for a UST laser projector, but contrast is a recurring complaint and long-term reliability is unknown.

Is the Optoma UHZ50 worth it?

Reddit's verdict is Stay Away. Don’t buy it — get the BenQ instead. Decent brightness and picture quality, but a low recommend rate and recurring reliability complaints make it hard to endorse over better-supported rivals.